Sunday, 1 March 2009

at.algebraic topology - The space of Lie group homomorphisms

The general criterion is:




Given connected compact Lie groups G,H, mathrmHom(G,H) has finitely many components if and only if H is semisimple or G=1.




Proof.
If G=1 there is nothing to prove.



Assume that H is not semisimple and Gneq1. Then there exists a 1-dimensional torus T in H and a closed normal subgroup N of codimension 1 such that TN=H. Define T=TcapN, so that Z is finite and define T=T/Z. Then mathrmHom(T,G) can be identified to the set of elements in mathfrakg whose exponential is 1; we have already seen that it has infinitely many components.



We have a continuous restriction map mathrmHom(H,G)tomathrmHom(T,G). Its image contains mathrmHom(T,G) (identified to those homomorphisms trivial on N), and mathrmHom(T,G) is clopen in mathrmHom(T,G) (indeed, let Z have exponent n; then 1 is an isolated point in the set K of elements ginG such that gn=1 and mathrmHom(T,G) is the fiber of (1,dots,1) for the mapping mathrmHom(T,G)toKZ mapping f to zmapstof(z)). Thus mathrmHom(H,G) has infinitely many components (the proof even shows that it has a continuous map onto an infinite discrete set).





Conversely, suppose H semisimple.

Consider the map L:mathrmHom(H,G)tomathcalL(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) mapping f to its tangent map between Lie algebras (mathcalL(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) denoting the whole space of linear maps). Then L is injective. Since L(f) is locally conjugate to f by the exponential map, L is continuous, and actually is a homeomorphism to its image (because if L(fn) tends to L(f), then in a given compact neighborhood of 1 we have fn tending to f uniformly, and this implies that fn tends to f uniformly on all of H).



If H is simply connected, then the image of f is equal to the set of Lie algebra homomorphisms mathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg), which is Zariski closed, and hence has finitely many components in the ordinary topology. In general (still assuming H semisimple), let tildeH be its universal covering and Z the (finite) kernel of tildeHtoH. Recalling that the exponential is surjective, write Z=exp(Z) for some finite subset Z of mathfrakh; then the image of L is the set of elements u in mathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) such that for all zinZ we have u(exp(z))=1. Let mathfrakg1 be the set of elements x in mathfrakg such that exp(x)=1: then we have the restatement: the image of L is
finmathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg):f(Z)subsetmathfrakg1.



Fix a faithful continuous linear representation of G (in mathrmSO(n) for some n), so that we have a faithful representation of mathfrakg (by antisymmetric matrices): then mathfrakg1 is the set of elements in mathfrakg whose eigenvalues are in 2ipimathbfZ. Note that as soon as Gneq1, it has infinitely many connected components (since all these eigenvalues can be achieved, using a 1-parameter subgroup whose image in G is a 1-dimensional torus).



Nevertheless, observe that (still assuming H compact semisimple) mathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) is a compact subset of the vector space mathcalL(mathfrakh,mathfrakg). Indeed, mathfrakh admits a basis (ej) such that each ej belongs to some subalgebra mathfrakhj isomorphic to mathfrakso(3), such that some 2-dimensional complex representation of mathfrakhi maps ej to the diagonal matrix (i,i) (where i2=1). It follows from representation theory of mathfraksl2 that for every n-dimensional complex representation rho of mathfrakhj (and hence of mathfrakh) maps ej to an element with eigenvalues in i(n1),dots,i(n1). Thus the trace of rho(ej)2 is le(n1)2n. Since mathrmtrace(XY) is a definite positive symmetric bilinear form on antisymmetric matrices, this shows that mathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) is bounded, hence compact.



In particular, there exists n0 such that eigenvalues of f(z) for all zinZ and finmathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) are in the interval [2ipin0,2ipin0]subsetimathbfR. Thus the image by L of mathrmHom(H,G) is the set of finmathrmHom(mathfrakh,mathfrakg) such that for every zinZ we have prodn0k=n0(f(z)2ipik)=0. This is a Zariski-closed subset, and hence has finitely many connected components in the ordinary topology, and hence so does the homeomorphic space mathrmHom(H,G).

No comments:

Post a Comment