As Sergei Ivanov pointed out in his first comment, it is necessary and sufficient, to solve your (ii) and (iii), to have sumni=1xi=sumni=1yi;;.
Now, there is a kernel involved next of dimension (n−1)2, these being matrices F satisfying F1=0 and Ft1=0. One may specify any entries desired in the upper left square n−1 by n−1 block of F, then fill in the final column and row. Any solution of (ii) and (iii) must be of the form C0+F;;.
Progress: for your purpose it is better to specify the matrix F as shown below for n=4, the other entries of F are forced by the condition that all row sums and all column sums are zero.
F = left( begin{array}{cccc} & r & s & t \ & & u & v \ a & & & w \ b & c & & end{array} right).
As a result, C0+F can be arranged to have all zeroes above the diagonal, then zeroes below a single layer alongside the main diagonal. The result is slightly better than what is called tridiagonal in that the entries above the diagonal are also 0.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tridiagonal_matrix
We have arranged
C^0 + F = left( begin{array}{cccc} a_1 & & & \ r_1 & b_1 & & \ & s_1 & c_1 & \ & & t_1 & d_1 end{array} right) .
Now that we know that we can insist on this shape, we can just start out with this and a simple scheme involving your (ii) and (iii) defines the values for all the nonzero positions. Furthermore,
if in addition x=y, then it follows from (ii) and (iii) that
C0+F is actually diagonal. Done.
No comments:
Post a Comment