homological algebra - Convergence of spectral sequences of cohomological type

Following the first chapter of Hatcher's great book "Spectral Sequences in Algebraic Topology", I got into problems with spectral sequences of cohomological type. Fix a ring $R$ once and for all. Please let me first recapitulate the homological situation.

An exact couple consists of bigraded $R$-modules $A$ and $E$ and bigraded $R$-module homomorphisms $i$, $j$, and $k$, such that

$$
begin{array}{rcl}A&xrightarrow{i}&Anewline {scriptsize k}nwarrow&&swarrow{scriptsize j}newline&E&end{array}
$$

is exact at every corner. Its derived pair with $A'=i(A)$ and $E'=H(E)$ with respect to $d=jcirc k$ is again exact. Before you wonder about the indices in what comes next, please continue reading up to the canonical example. This will explain the degrees, if I have not made a mistake. Let $ain mathbb{N}$ (in the example below we have $a=1$). Set $r=0$ for the moment. An exact couple with bidegrees

$$
begin{array}{rcl}A^{(r)}&xrightarrow{(1,-1)}&A^{(r)}newline {scriptsize (-1,0)}nwarrow&&swarrow{scriptsize (-(a-1+r),(a-1+r))}newline&E^{(r)}&end{array}
$$

induces a spectral sequence $E_{p,q}^{r+a}=E_{p,q}^{(r)}$ of homological type with differentials $d^{r+a}=j^{(r)}circ k^{(r)}$. Here ${scriptsize something}^{(r)}$ denotes the corresponding term in the $r$-th derived couple. The $r$-th derived couple has bidegrees as in the diagram above.

Here is the canonical example. Let $0=C_{-1}subseteq C_0subseteqldots C_psubseteqldots =C$ be a filtration of a chain complex $C$. Take for example the singular complex of a topological space $X$ filtered by a filtration of $X$. We have many long exact sequences in homology, here are three of them:
$$
begin{array}{lcccccr}
to H_{p+q}(C_p,C_{p-1})&xrightarrow{k}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-1})&xrightarrow{i}&H_{p+q-1}(C_p)&xrightarrow{j}&H_{p+q-1}(C_p,C_{p-1})tonewline
to H_{p+q}(C_{p-1},C_{p-2})&xrightarrow{k}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-2})&xrightarrow{i}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-1})&xrightarrow{j}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-1},C_{p-2})tonewline
to H_{p+q}(C_{p-2},C_{p-3})&xrightarrow{k}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-3})&xrightarrow{i}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-2})&xrightarrow{j}&H_{p+q-1}(C_{p-2},C_{p-3})to
end{array}
$$

There is an exact couple as above with $a=1$ and $E_{p,q}=H_{p+q}(C_p,C_{p-1})$ and $A_{p,q}=H_{p+q}(C_p)$. Please note, that all the bigrades are correct. To follow $d^1:E_{p,q}^1to E_{p-1,q}^1$, you start at the upper left corner, apply $k$, go one row down (the entries are equal here if you move one right) and apply $j$. One can also follow $d^2$ but this is not quite correct since you have to deal with representatives in $E^1$. Here you start at the upper left corner and get to the lower right.

Here is Hatcher's illuminating argument for convergence. I have never seen this so clearly presented.

The spectral sequence $E^1(C_bullet)$ of homological type
converges to $H_{p+q}(C)$ if it is bounded (=only
finitely many non-zero entries on
every fixed diagonal $p+q$). One has
$$ E^infty_{p,q}=i(H_{p+q}(C_p))/i(H_{p+q}(C_{p-1})) .$$
($i$ denotes the image in the colimit $H_{p+q}(C)$.)

Proof. Let $r$ be large and consider (I don't know if this renders correctly) the $r$-th derived couple

$$
begin{array}{c}
to E^{r}_{p+r,q-r+1}xrightarrow{k^{r}} A^{r}_{p+r-1,q-r+1}xrightarrow{i^{r}}A^{r}_{p+r,q-r}newline
xrightarrow{j^{r}}E^{r}_{p,q}xrightarrow{k^{r}}newline
A^{r}_{p-1,q}xrightarrow{i^{r}}A^{r}_{p,q-1}xrightarrow{j^{r}}E^{r}_{p-r,q-1+r}to.
end{array}
$$

The first and the last term are $0$ because of the bounding assumption. We have $A_{p,q}^{r}=i(A^1_{p-r,q+r})$ and since $C_n$ is zero for $n<0$, the last three terms are $0$. Exactness implies the result.

Now the cohomological situation.

Let $0=C_{-1}subseteq C_0subseteqldots C_psubseteqldots =C$ be a filtration of a chain complex $C$. Take again for example the singular complex of a topological space $X$ filtered by a filtration of $X$. Understand the cohomology $H^n(C)$ of $C$ as $H_n(hom(C,mathbb{Z}))$, the homology of the dualized complex as one does in topology.

Again we have many long exact sequences:
$$
begin{array}{lcccccr}
to H^{p+q}(C_p,C_{p-1})&xrightarrow{k}&H^{p+q}(C_p)&xrightarrow{i}&H^{p+q}(C_{p-1})&xrightarrow{j}&H^{p+q+1}(C_p,C_{p-1})tonewline
to H^{p+q}(C_{p+1},C_p)&xrightarrow{k}&H^{p+q}(C_{p+1})&xrightarrow{i}&H^{p+q}(C_{p})&xrightarrow{j}&H^{p+q+1}(C_{p+1},C_{p})tonewline
to H^{p+q}(C_{p+2},C_{p+1})&xrightarrow{k}&H^{p+q}(C_{p+2})&xrightarrow{i}&H^{p+q}(C_{p+1})&xrightarrow{j}&H^{p+q+1}(C_{p+2},C_{p+1})to
end{array}
$$

One can again follow $d^1:E_{p,q}^1to E_{p+1,q}^1$, etc. What is an exact couple of cohomological type? The only thing which fits into the picture is this: Set $A^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(C_p)$ and $E^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(C_p,C_{p-1})$ and $a=1$.

An exact couple with bidegrees

$$
begin{array}{rcl}A_{(r)}&xrightarrow{(-1,1)}&A_{(r)}newline {scriptsize (0,0)}nwarrow&&swarrow{scriptsize (a+r,-(a-1+r))}newline&E_{(r)}&end{array}
$$

induces a spectral sequence $E_{r+a}=E_{(r)}$ of cohomological type with differentials $d_{r+a}=j_{(r)}circ k_{(r)}$. Here ${scriptsize something}_{(r)}$ denotes the corresponding term in the $r$-th derived couple. The $r$-th derived couple has bidegrees as in the diagram.

Now I would like to establish the following result. This is done nowhere since everything is said to be "dual" to the homological case. But if you look at the indices...hmm:

The spectral sequence $E_1(C_bullet)$ of cohomological type
converges to $H^{p+q}(C)$ if it is bounded. One has
$$ E_infty^{p,q}=ker(H^{p+q}(C)to H^{p+q}(C_{p-1}))/ker(H^{p+q}(C)to H^{p+q}(C_{p})) .$$

Proof? Let $r$ be large and consider (I don't know if this renders correctly) the $r$-th derived couple

$$
begin{array}{c}
to E_{r}^{p-r,q+r-1}xrightarrow{k_{r}} A_{r}^{p-r,q+r-1}xrightarrow{i_{r}}A_{r}^{p-r-1,q+r}newline
xrightarrow{j_{r}}E_{r}^{p,q}xrightarrow{k_{r}}newline
A_{r}^{p,q}xrightarrow{i_{r}}A_{r}^{p-1,q+1}xrightarrow{j_{r}}E_{r}^{p+r,q-r+1}to.
end{array}
$$

The last term is $0$ because of the bounding assumption. We have $A_{r}^{p,q}=i(A^{p+r,q-r}_1)$ and since $C_n$ is zero for $n<0$, the second and the third term are $0$. Exactness implies that
$$
E_r^{p,q}=ker(i(H^{p+q}(C_{p+r}))to i(H^{p+q}(C_{p+r-1}))).
$$
I cannot see how the result follows from this. Perhaps it is "only" a limit trick but I can not see it. So the question is:

How does Lemma 1.2. of Hatcher's text works in the cohomological case?