Assume you have a proper filter F that avoids both b and negb. Then, you could consider the filter generated by Fcupb - which is to say the smallest filter F′ containing F and b.
Since F was a proper filter it follows that 0notinF.
If 0inF′, then this means that there is some finF′ such that bwedgef=0. Now, negb=0veenegb=(bwedgef)veenegb=(bveenegb)wedge(fveenegb)=1wedge(fveenegb)=fveenegb. Thus f≤negb, which means that negbinF′.
Since negbinF′, either negbinF or negb may be acquired by meets and upwards closures from Fcupb. Say bwedgef≤negb for some finF. Then bwedgef=bwedgefwedgenegb=bwedgenegbwedgef=0wedgef=0 for an finF and by the above argument, we derive negbinF. This is a contradiction, from which we can derive that 0notinF.
Hence, 0notinF′, and thus F′ is a proper ideal strictly containing F.
No comments:
Post a Comment