This is my attempt at an answer. I think I might be off in justifying the second diagram. It's based on the proof in Bredon, but I think it might be a little simpler. Corrections are welcome, of course!
For convenience, we introduce some notation and conventions. We define subsets of Sn=(c,t):cinSn−1,tinI/sim
To compute cup products in K, we use the commutative diagram
H^n(K) x H^n(K) ---------> H^{2n}(K)
^ cup ^
| |
| cup |
H^n(K,X) x H^n(K,Y) -----> H^{2n}(K,S^n)
which follows from the map (K,emptyset,emptyset)rightarrow(K,X,Y) and naturality; the vertical maps are isomorphisms by the long exact sequence in cohomology for pairs. Let the generator x of Hn(K) correspond to the generator xY of Hn(K,X) and the generator xX of Hn(K,Y), so that xYcupxX in H2n(K,Sn) corresponds to x2 in H2n(K).
To understand the image of the cup product, we use the evident map j:(e2n,A,B)rightarrow(K,X,Y). We have the diagram
H^n(K,X) = H^n(S^n,X) = H^n(Y,Z) = H^{n-1}(Z)
| |
| j^* | j^*
| |
V V
H^n(e^{2n},A) = H^n(e^n_A,S^{n-1}_A) = H^{n-1}(S^{n-1}_A)
which commutes because of the naturality of the isomorphisms involved (namely, along the top: cellular cohomology, excision and homotopy invariance, lexseq for pairs; along the bottom: homotopy invariance, lexseq for pairs). By definition of degree, the map jast:Hn−1(Z)rightarrowHn−1(Sn−1A) is multiplication by alpha. Hence, so is the map jast:Hn(K,X)rightarrowHn(e2n,A). Similarly, the map jast:Hn(K,Y)rightarrowHn(e2n,B) is multiplication by beta. Now, jast:H2n(K,Sn)rightarrowH2n(e2n,S2n−1) is an isomorphism, and jast(xYcupxX) is alphabeta times a generator of H2n(e2n,S2n−1). Thus xYcupxX is alphabeta times a generator of H2n(K,Sn). So by the first diagram, H(h(g))=alphabeta.
No comments:
Post a Comment