ag.algebraic geometry - Definition of étale for rings

You say that a ring homomorphism $phi: A to B$ is étale (resp. smooth, unramified), or that $B$ is étale (resp. smooth, unramified) over $A$ is the following two conditions are satisfied:

• $A to B$ is formally étale (resp. formally smooth, formally unramified): for every square-zero extension of $A$-algebras $R' to R$ (meaning that the kernel $I$ satisfies $I^2 = 0$) the natural map $$mathrm{Hom}_A(B, R') to mathrm{Hom}_{A}(B, R)$$ is bijective (resp. surjective, injective).


• $B$ is esentially of finite presentation over $A$: $A to B$ factors as $A to C to B$, where $A to C$ is of finite presentation and $C to B$ is $C$-isomorphic to a localization morphism $C to S^{-1}C$ for some multiplicatively closed subset $S subset C$.

The second condition is just a finiteness condition; the meat of the concept is in the first one. Formal smoothness is often referred to as the infinitesimal lifting property. Geometrically speaking, it says that if the affine scheme $mathrm{Spec}B$ is smooth over $mathrm{Spec}A$, then any map from $mathrm{Spec}B$ to $mathrm{Spec}R$ lifts to any square-zero (and hence any infinitesimal) deformation $mathrm{Spec}R'$. Moreover, if $mathrm{Spec}B$ is étale over $mathrm{Spec}A$ this lifting is unique.

Differential-geometrically, unramifiedness, smoothness and étaleness correspond to the tangent map of $mathrm{Spec}phi$ being injective, surjective and bijective, respectively. In particular, étale is the generalization to the algebraic case of the concept of local isomorphism.

There are two references you might want to consult. The first one, in which you can read all about the formal properties of these morphisms, is Iversen's "Generic Local Structure in Commutative Algebra". The second one, Hartshorne's "Deformation Theory", will give you a lot of information about the geometry; section 4 of chapter 1 (available online) talks about the infinitesimal lifting property.

EDIT: The EGA definition of étale morphism of rings is slightly different from the above, in the sense that it requires finite presentation, not just locally of finite presentation: see the comments below.

• Next pr.probability - Correlation in graph coloring
• Previous gr.group theory - Groupoid structure on G/H?