Pick an even dimensional real vector space V of dimension n and fix a symplectic form omega on V. Look at it as a map omega:VotimesVtomathbbR by extending it from Lambda2V to VotimesV as zero on the symmetric part. Fix also an inner product langlemathord−,mathord−rangle in V.
Let k be odd and such that 1leqkleqn.
Let WsubseteqV be an k-dimensional subspace, and let Wperp and Wperpomega be the subspaces orthogonal to W with respect to langlemathord−,mathord−rangle and to omega, respectively. We know that dimWperp=dimWperpomega=dimV−dimW.
The restriction omega|WotimesWperp:WotimesWperptomathbbR, which I will write for simplicity just omegaW, is not zero. Indeed, if it were zero, we would have that Wperp is contained in Wperpomega, so in fact these two orthogonal subspaces would be equal, and in consequence we would have that WcapWperpomega=WcapWperp=0. This would tell us that W is in fact a symplectic subspace of V, which is absurd because it is odd dimensional.
Now omegaW is an element of hom(WotimesWperp,mathbbR), which identifies canonically with hom(W,hom(Wperp,mathbbR)). The inner product langlemathord−,mathord−rangle restricts to an inner product on Wperp which allows us to identify canonically (because the inner product is fixed!) hom(Wperp,mathbbR) with Wperp. After all these identifications, we have a non zero vector omegaW in hom(W,Wperp).
Now, as explained in an answer to a MO question, hom(W,Wperp) parametrizes a neighborhood of W in G(n,k), so it also can be identified with the tangent space to G(n,k) at W.
We thus see that the rule WmapstoomegaW gives a non-zero tangent vector field.
No comments:
Post a Comment