To make things concrete, suppose that we're working in characteristic ne2,3 (we can do something similar in those cases, though it gets messier), and the equation of the curve is
E:y2=x3+ax+b
and the equation of the twist is:
E(d):dy2=x3+ax+b.
Multiplying this by d3:
(d2y)2=(dx)3+ad2(dx)+d3b
for this to be isomorphic to E over k it is necessary and sufficient that
there is a lambdaink∗ such that (see Silverman, or any other book on elliptic curves)
such that ad2=alambda4, bd3=blambda6. If a,bne0 then we must have
lambda6=d3 and lambda4=d2, which shows that lambda2=d which you've ruled out. If b=0 you have, by taking square roots, lambda2=pmd, and only the minus sign is possible. If a=0 (and thus bne0) then lambda6=d3. But then (lambda3/d)2=d3/d2=d, which you've also ruled out. Thus, only b=0 is possible, which is j=1728.
No comments:
Post a Comment