Thursday, 12 February 2009

linear algebra - Slick proof?: A vector space has the same dimension as its dual if and only if it is finite dimensional

It is clearly enough to show that an infinite dimensional vector space V has smaller dimension that its dual V.



Let B be a basis of V, let mathcalP(B) be the set of its subsets, and for each AinmathcalP(B) let chiAinV be the unique functional on V such that the restriction chiA|B is the characteristic function of A. This gives us a map chi:AinmathcalP(B)mapstochiAinV.



Now a complete infinite boolean algebra mathcalB contains an independent subset X such that |X|=|mathcalB|---here, that X be independent means that whenever n,mgeq0 and x1,dots,xn,y1,dots,yminX we have x1cdotsxnoverliney1cdotsoverlineynneq0. (This is true in this generality according to [Balcar, B.; Franěk, F. Independent families in complete Boolean algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 274 (1982), no. 2, 607--618. MR0675069], but when mathcalB=mathcalP(Z) is the algebra of subsets of an infinite set Z, this is a classical theorem of [Fichtenholz, G. M; Kantorovich L. V. Sur les opérations linéaires dans l'espace des fonctions bornées. Studia Math. 5 (1934) 69--98.] and [Hausdorff, F. Über zwei Sätze von G. Fichtenholz und L. Kantorovich. Studia Math. 6 (1936) 18--19])



If X is such an independent subset of mathcalP(B) (which is a complete infinite boolean algebra), then chi(X) is a linearly independent subset of V, as one can easily check. It follows that the dimension of V is at least |X|=|mathcalP(B)|, which is strictly larger than |B|.



Later: The proof of the existence of an independent subset is not hard; it is given, for example, in this notes by J. D. Monk as Theorem 8.9. In any case, I think this proof is pretty because it captures precisely the intuition (or, rather, my intuition) of why this is true. I have not seen the paper by Fichtenhold and Kantorovich (I'd love to get a copy!) but judging from its title one sees that they were doing similar things...

No comments:

Post a Comment