I think an answer is given by the arguments that Segal gives in Section 4 of his paper on "Categories and Cohomology Theories" (aka, the Gamma-space paper), in Topology, v.13. I'll try to sketch the main idea, translated into the context of simplicial commutative monoids. I'll show that if M is a discrete simplicial commutative monoid, then it's group completion is homotopically discrete; according to the comments, this should answer the question.
Given a commutative monoid M, we can define a simplicial commuative monoid M′ as the nerve of the category whose objects are (m1,m2)inMtimesM, and where morphisms (m1,m2)to(m′1,m′2) are minM such that mim=m′i. We can prolong this to a functor on simplicial commutative monoids.
Let H=H∗|M|=H∗(|M|,F) (the homology of the geometric realization of M, with coefficients in some field F), viewed as a commutative ring under the pontryagin product. Then Segal shows that H∗|M′|approxH[pi−1], where pi denotes the image of pi0|M| in H0|M]. His proof amounts to computing the homology spectral sequence for a simplicial space whose realization is M′, and whose E2-term is mathrmTorHi(HotimesH,F), and observing that the higher tor-groups vanish.
This means that if M is discrete, then H∗|M′| is concentrated in degree 0. Since |M′| is a grouplike commutative monoid, the Hurewicz theorem should tell us that |M′| is weakly equivalent to a discrete space, namely the group completion of the monoid M.
Segal goes on to show that BMtoBM′ is a weak equivalence, using the above homology calculation and another spectral sequence. Since M′ is weakly equivalent to a group, OmegaBMapproxOmegaBM′approxM′.
No comments:
Post a Comment