I'm sure that Gil's answer is wise and that it is a good idea to look at Alon and Spencer's book. Here also is a quick summary of what is going on.
Suppose that X1,ldots,Xn are random variables, and suppose for simplicity that they take finitely many values. Suppose that you prescribe the distribution of each Xi, and suppose also that you want the random variables to be pairwise independent or k-wise independent. Then the constraints on the joint distribution are a finite list of equalities and inequalities. The solution set is a polytope whose dimension is fairly predictable, and the fully independent distribution is always in the interior of this polytope. If you are interested in k-wise independent distributions that are far from k+1-wise independent, then it can be difficult to determine what is achievable because the polytope is complicated. (The vertices are a particularly interesting and non-trivial class: k-wise independent distributions with small support. These are called "weighted orthogonal arrays".) However, if you're just intersted in examples, it is much easier to write down a small deviation of the fully independent distribution. The deviation just satisfies linear equations.
For example, suppose that X,Y,Z are three unbiased Bernoulli random variables (coin flips) that take values 0 and 1. Then there are 8 probabilities pijk, one for each outcome (X,Y,Z)=(i,j,k). Then you can set
pijk=frac18+(−1)ijkepsilon.qquadqquadqquadtext(1)
to get a pairwise independent but not independent distribution. In this simple example, there is a 1-dimensional space of deviations and it is easy to compute how far you can vary the independent solution. (Up to |epsilon|=frac18.) In larger cases, the variations can be multidimensional and the polytope of deviations can be more complicated.
Addendum: If I have not made a mistake, all deviations for any finite list of discrete random variables are linear combinations of those of the form (1). More precisely, given discrete random variables X1,ldots,Xn, let fi be some function of the value of Xi which is 1 for one value, −1 for another value, and 0 otherwise. Then you can make deviations proportional to prodfij as long as there are at least k+1 factors. It looks like all deviations are a linear combination of those of this form.
No comments:
Post a Comment