Sunday, 8 April 2012

nt.number theory - Galoisian sets of prime numbers

In order to add my bit to the already rich content on this site, here is a
nice family of galoisian extensions Kl|bfQ with group rmGL2(bfFl) (indexed by primes lneq5) for which a ``reciprocity law'' can be
written down explicitly. I've come across this family recently while writing
an expository article.



Let E be the elliptic curve (over bfQ) of conductor 11 defined by
y2+y=x3x2, with associated modular form
eta12,112=qprodk>0(1qk)2(1q11k)2=sumn>0cnqn.


Let Kl=bfQ(E[l]), which is thus galoisian over bfQ and unramified at
every prime pneq11,l.



One can deduce from cor.1 on p.308 of Serre (Inventiones 1972) that for every
prime lneq5, the representation
rhoE,l:rmGal(Kl|bfQ)rightarrowrmGL2(bfFl)


we get upon choosing an bfFl-basis of E[l] is an isomorphism;
cf. the online notes on Serre's conjecture by Ribet and Stein. Shimura did
this for lin[9,97] (Crelle 1966).



Suppose henceforth that l is a prime neq5 and that p is a prime
neq11,l. The characteristic polynomial of rhoE,l(rmFrobp)inrmGL2(bfFl) is
T2barcpT+barpinbfFl[X].


The prime p splits completely in Kl if and only if rmFrobp=1 in
rmGal(Kl|bfQ), which happens if and only if
rho_{E,l}({rm Frob}_p)=pmatrix{1&0cr0&1}.

If so, then p,cpequiv1,2pmodl but not conversely, for the matrix
displaystylepmatrix{1&1cr0&1} also has the characteristic polynomial
T2bar2T+bar1. But these congruences on p,cp do rule out an awful lot
of primes as not splitting completely in Kl.



In summary, we have the following ``reciprocity law" for Kl :
hbox($p$splitscompletelyin$Kl$)quadLeftrightarrowquadEp[l]subsetEp(bfFp),


where Ep is the reduction of E modulo p. Indeed, reduction modulo p
identifies E[l] with Ep[l] and the action of rmFrobp on the former
space with the action of the canonical generator varphipinrmGal(barbfFp|bfFp) on the latter space. To say that varphip
acts trivially on Ep[l] is the same as saying that Ep[l] is contained in
the bfFp-rational points of Ep. The analogy with the multiplicative
group mu is perfect:
hbox($pneql$splitscompletelyin$bfQ(mu[l])$)quadLeftrightarrowquadmup[l]subsetmup(bfFp)

(Leftrightarrowl|p1Leftrightarrowpequiv1pmodl), where mup is not the p-torsion of mu but the reduction of mu modulo p.



I requested Tim Dokchitser to compute the first ten p which split completely
in K7, and his instantaneous response was 4831, 22051, 78583, 125441,
129641, 147617, 153287, 173573, 195581, and 199501.



It is true that all this (except the list of these ten primes) was known before Serre's conjecture was proved
(2006--9) or even formulated (1973--87), but I find this example a very good
illustration of the kind of reciprocity laws it provides.



I hope you enjoyed it as much as I did.

No comments:

Post a Comment