Saturday, 19 May 2012

ag.algebraic geometry - What is a twisted D-Module intuitively?

NOTE: I ended up writing out a long version of this and correcting a mistake, so this is substantially changed from the old answer.



If you're taking twisted differential operators in a complex power of a line bundle, Lc, then you should think of them as vector bundles/sheaves on the total space T of L minus its zero section, endowed with a flat connection that behaves specially along the fibers of the bundle projection map.



Special how? The action of mathbbC by fiber rotation has a differential, which is a vector field on the total space that looks like tfracddt for any trivialization, where t is the coordinate on the fiber. One should take a connection where differentiating along this vector field integrates to an equivariant structure for mathbbC (that is, it has integral eigenvalues).



To see this, note that mathbbC -invariant functions on T are the same as functions on X. However, there are more mathbbC-invariant vector fields; there's a Lie algebra map from the sheaf Y of mathbbC-invariant vector fields on T to vector fields on X, but the kernel is given by functions times the vector field tfracddt (the action vector field for mathbbC). This element is central, since we're looking at mathbbC-invariant vector fields (which exactly means they commute with the action vector field). This is a central extension of Lie algebras, and Chern-Weil theory tells us that the first Chern class of the line bundle is the obstruction to splitting this extension. If you want to get very fancy, this gives a Lie algebroid over X, of a special type called a Picard Lie algebroid.



Now, we can think of sections of powers of this line bundle as functions on T with a fixed weight under mathbbC: the sections of Lc have weight c. So, on the sections of Lc, I have the relation (tfracddtc)s=0, so the differential operators twisted by Lc are given by taking mathcalOX, the vector fields Y, letting them commute past each other in the usual way, and then imposing tfracddtc=0.



Now, if c isn't an integer, then there aren't going to be any functions that satisfy this equation, but the description I gave of the TDO is fine. There's just nothing interesting to act on.



Well, except there might be. I could take some other D-module on T instead, and I would still get an action of the TDO on the sheaf of solutions to (tfracddtc)s=0 in that D-module; this gives a functor from D-modules on T to twisted D-modules on X. This functor is an equivalence when restricted to the subcategory of D-modules where tfracddtc integrates to a mathbbC-action (since you can always pull back a twisted D-module on X and get a D-module of this form on Y). Note that whether this vector field integrates only depends on the class of c modulo mathbbZ; if you track through these functors, the resulting equivalence between modules of TDOs is tensoring with the correct power of the line bundle.



Now, assume I have a simple holonomic twisted D-module; the corresponding mathbbC-equivariant D-module on T is also simple, so this is an intermediate extension of a mathbbC-equivariant local system on a locally closed subvariety T which is the preimage of some XsubsetX. The monodromy of a flat section of this local system around the fiber must be e2piic, so if c is irrational, the fundamental group of the fiber must inject into that of T, whereas if c=a/b in lowest form, then the kernel of this map of fundamental groups can only contain loops at go around the fiber a multiple of b times (even then, you could have trouble depending on the structure of the fundamental group).

No comments:

Post a Comment