Tuesday, 1 April 2008

ag.algebraic geometry - What classes am I missing in the Picard lattice of a Kummer K3 surface?

The lattice LK3=H2(K3,mathbbZ) is 2E8+3U, with E8 negative definite and U the hyperbolic lattice for the bilinear form xy. It is unimodular and has signature (3,19).



The 16 (-2)-curves Ei form a sublattice 16A1 of determinant 216. It is not primitive in LK3. The primitive lattice K containing it is computed as follows. Consider a linear combination F=frac12sumaiEi with ai=0,1. Recall that Ei are labeled by the 2-torsion points of the torus A, i.e. the elements of the group A[2].



Then F is in K iff the function a:A[2]tomathbbF2,
imapstoai, is affine-linear. You will find the proof of this statement in Barth-(Hulek-)Peters-van de Ven "Compact complex surfaces", VIII.5.
(The element frac12sumEi in your example corresponds to the constant function 1, which is affine linear).
Thus, K has index 25 in 16A1 and its determinant is 216/(25)2=26.



K is called the Kummer lattice. By the above, it is a concrete negative-definite lattice of rank 16 with determinant 26. Nikulin proved that a K3 surface is a Kummer surface iff Pic(X) contains K.



The orthogonal complement Kperp of K in LK3 is H2(A,mathbbZ) but with the intersection form multiplied by 2. As a lattice, it is isomorphic to 3U(2). It has determinant 26, the same as K. The lattice LK3=H2(K3,mathbbZ) is recovered from the primitive orthogonal summands K and Kperp.



However, your question has "Picard lattice" in the title. The Picard group of X is strictly smaller than H2(X,mathbbZ). To begin with, it has signature (1,r1), not (3,19). For a Kummer surface, it contains Kummer lattice K described above, and its intersection with Kperp is the image of the Picard group of A. For a Kummer surface one has r=17,18,19 or 20.



For the Mori-Kleiman cone of effective curves, which you would need for Gromov-Witten theory, the description you put in a box is already the best possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment