Friday, 20 June 2008

ra.rings and algebras - When is the essential extension commutes with colimits(or push forward)

First, I want to point out that in general there is no surjection from a direct product of copies of R to an arbitrary module M. For example, if R=mathbbZ and M=mathbbZ(omega) (a countable direct sum of copies of mathbbZ), then there is no surjection mathbbZItoM according to the paper "Extension of a theorem on direct products of slender modules" by John D. O'Neill. [There are probably much simpler examples, but this will do.]



Thus, in general, there is no map p, and thus no pushout N.



Second, maps defined from RI are notoriously difficult to understand, and often depend on cardinality considerations for the set I. In particular, when R=mathbbZ, things get really weird when |I| is measurable.



That all said, assume p does exist. Since, as you pointed out, N is an injective module, we just need to examine when N is an essential extension of M (viewing M as a submodule). One obvious situation when this holds is when R itself is a (right) self-injective ring, for in that case N=M is already injective. Of course, this case is somewhat trivial since self-injective hereditary rings are already semisimple.



More generally, write



N=MoplusE(R)I/langle(p(x),i(x)):xinRIrangle.



For each einE(R)Isetminus0, let Xe:=rinR:erinRI. The set Ee=er:rinXeR is a submodule of RI. Given any element overline(m,e)inNsetminusM, we need overline(m,e)RcapMneq(0). Thus, we need some element rinXe such that mrneqp(er). In other words, we do not want p|Ee to extend to a map eRtoM. Thus, whatever condition you impose will need to restrict what types of maps p are available.

No comments:

Post a Comment