Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Formal Geometry

I am writing to post an answer to my own question. The answer below consists of what I was able to jot down from a seminar talk by Jacob Lurie, and a patient followup explanation by Roman Travkin, followed by a correction by David Ben-Zvi. Of course, mistakes and naivete in the translation are solely attributed to me. Since the answer was given to me in response to my asking on MO, it seems that karma dictates that I record it here.



The deRham stack, XdR, of a scheme X is defined as a functor on test schemes S by



XdR(S):=textrmMaps:SredtoX.



where Sred is the reduced scheme associated to a scheme S. It is representable as a stack - I think always, but at least when X is smooth - which we should assume for later purposes anyways (maybe everything should be based over mathbbC also? I welcome corrections, which I'll incorporate).



Okay so X, viewed as the functor X(S)=textrmMaps:StoX has a natural map pi:XtoXdR, by pre-composing with SredtoS.



There is a scheme AutX of infinite type over a smooth X whose set of points consists of pairs (xinX,tx:X(x)conghatDn), where hatDn is the formal disc, mathcalO(hatDn):=mathbbC[[x1,ldots,xn]]. The fiber over each point xinX is the group Aut0(X(x)) of automorphisms of the formal neighborhood of x preserving the maximal ideal, which is in turn (non-canonically) isomorphic to Aut0(hatDn), the group of automorphisms of hatDn preserving the origin.



Now, the scheme AutX is actually a hatG-torsor over XdR, where (I gather from David Ben-Zvi's comments) hatG is something more like an inductive limit of the groups of automorphisms on nth infinitessimal neighboroods of the origin in Dn.



Now, suppose that M is a Wn module, which has the property that the operators xipartiali for all i are diagonalizable with finite dimensional eigenspaces. (These we should think of as being the diagonals hi for a copy of mathfrakgln sitting inside Wn). In this case, one can prove some nice things.



First, in representation theory: M lies in the category generated by modules mathcalFlambda which are coinduced from Vlambda, the irreducible of mathfrakgln.` That is, as vector spaces the mathcalFlambdas are just VlambdaotimesC[x1,ldots,xn], and the action is given by natural formulas. So M is a (possibly infinite) extension of such things. But there is a theory of weights which control the representation theory somewhat. See A. N. Rudakov. Irreducible representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras of Cartan type. Math. USSR Izv. Vol. 8, pgs. 836-866, which has been translated to English.



Second, in geometry: The module M is a Harish-Chandra module for the pair (Wn,Aut0(C[[x1,...,xn]])). This means: Wn has a Lie sub algebra W0 of vector fields which vanish at the origin (so they have no constant vector field terms like partiali). W0 (or perhaps its completion w.r.t order of vanishing at origin) is the Lie algebra of Aut0(C[[x1,...,xn]]), as it consists of derivations which preserve the maximal ideal (not sure exactly how you make precise that it is "the Lie algebra", but anyways, there is an exponential map turning an integrable W0 module into an Aut0(C[[x1,...,xn]])-module ). The assumptions on M were precisely those that make M an integrable W0 module, and so we can regard M as a G-module. Well now we have an associated bundle construction for the G-torsor AutXtoX, and we can use this to produce a sheaf of vector spaces (not quasi-coherent!) over X with fiber M.



Better M has an action of the operators partiali, and we can exponentiate the action of all of Wn to the group hatG. That means that we can instead construct the associated bundle for the hatG torsor AutXtoXdR, which will give us a bundle over XdR with fiber M again. Now, we can pullback this bundle via pi to get a bundle on X with fiber M. This time, however, it's a pullback of a sheaf of vector spaces on the deRham stack, which by (some people's) definition is a crystal of vector spaces on X.

No comments:

Post a Comment