Consider the function $f$ on $S_n$ which equals $1/n$ on all adjacent transpositions $(i,i+1)$, where we let $n+1 = 1$, and $0$ otherwise, and its Fourier transform $hat{f}(rho)$ evaluated at the irreducible representations.
Recall the irreducible representations of $S_n$ are indexed by the set of partitions of $n$. Partitions here are written as a finite non-increasing sequence of positive integers that add up to $n$.
When $rho$ is the representation corresponding to the partition $(n)$, the matrix $hat{f}(rho)$ is simply the $1 times 1$ matrix $[1]$.
When $rho$ is the representation corresponding to the partition $(n-1,1)$, the resulting matrix $hat{f}(rho)$ can be explicitly diagonalized, since it can be extended into a cyclic matrix on $mathbb{R}^n$. The eigenvalues are simply $cos frac{2pi k}{n}$ where $k = 1, ldots n-1$. Therefore the spectral gap for that matrix (the smallest gap between $1$ and an eigenvalue not equal to $1$) is simply
$$1-cos frac{2 pi}{n} = 1-cos frac{2(n-1)pi}{n} = frac{2 pi^2}{n^2} + O(frac{1}{n^3})$$.
the following questions are in increasing levels of difficulty and are interesting to Markov chain theorists:
- Is it true that all other eigenvalues of $hat{f}(rho)$ for some irreducible representation $rho$ are strictly less than $1-cos frac{2 pi}{n}$ in absolute value?
Denote by $e_{lambda,j}$, $j = 1, ldots, d_lambda$ the eigenvalues of $hat{f}(rho_lambda)$, where $rho_lambda$ is the representation associated with the partition $lambda$ and $d_lambda$ is the dimension of that representation.
For any fixed $k in mathbb{N}$, is it true that $ (1-max_j e_{lambda,j}) le (n-lambda_1) frac{2 pi^2}{n^2} + O(frac{1}{n^3})$, for $n-lambda_1 le k$? Here $lambda_1$ denotes the longest part of the partition $lambda$.
If $lambda > lambda'$ in the sense that one can move blocks in the Ferrers diagram of $lambda'$ in the up and right direction to obtain $lambda$, for instance $(n-1,1) > (n-2,1,1)$, is it true that the spectral gap of $hat{f}(rho_lambda)$ is smaller than that associated with $lambda'$?
Give an explicit formula for $e_{lambda,j}$. This is most likely not possible.
This question shows how hard it can be to diagonalize matrices and to understand the representation theory of $S_n$ at a practical level.
No comments:
Post a Comment