Hi everybody,
I have a question about log canonical thresholds / complex singularity exponents.
If I understood well, this invariant sees more things than the multiplicity, for example, the cusp in dimension 1 (x3+y2=0) has c0=5/6 and the ordinary quadratic singularity has c_0=1.
I have several questions :
1) Is it true that for the singularity xa+yb+zc=0, the complex singulary exponent is min(1;1/a+1/b+1/c) ?
2) If it's true, how to distinguish x3+y2+z2=0 and the ordinary quadratic surface singularity ? Is there another invariant (besides the Milnor number) ?
3) If I have a variety with isolated singularities, does it make sense to try to measure its 'singularity' by adding the exponents at all the singular points ? Or taking the inf ?
4) compared to the Milnor number, what is the advantage of working with this invariant ? I thought it would be a way to say that a curve with a cusp is 'more singular' than a curve with two ordinary quadratic points (with the Milnor number they are 'equaly singular'), but I don't know if that makes sense.
Thanks in advance,
J-B B
No comments:
Post a Comment