I have a passing familiarity with moduli theory, which gets me in trouble when I want to understand specific examples.
The basic question I would like to understand is how to prove something is a versal deformation of the simple node. To be specific, let
X0:=Spec(mathbbC[x,y]/xy)
and let
Xver:=Spec(mathbbC[x,y,t]/xy−t)
Note that there is a natural map XverrightarrowmathbbA1 which sends a point to its t-coordinate, whose fiber over zero is X0.
I want to claim that Xver is a versal deformation of X0. What I mean by this is as follows. Consider a faithfully flat morphism pi:XrightarrowB, together with a distinguished point pinB such that pi−1(p) is isomorphic to X0. Then there is
- an open neighborhood B′subsetB of p,
- a (non-unique) map f0:B′rightarrowmathbbA1 which takes p to 0,
- and a (non-unique) map f1:pi−1(B′)rightarrowXver
such that the natural diagram
pi−1(B′)rightarrowXver
downarrow;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;downarrow
B′;;;;;rightarrow;;;;;B
is commutative, and is a pullback diagram (ie, a fibered product). Conceptually, this says that any (sufficiently small) faithfully flat family which contains a copy of X0 must be gotten from pullback from the family XverrightarrowmathbbA1. (Note that when I refer to preimages and fibers, I mean the scheme-theoretic ones)
However, I am having trouble showing this. I have been approaching this from the algebraic perspective, by considering formal deformations of the algebra mathbbC[x,y]/xy. These aren't hard to understand, and it is straight-forward to construct maps from mathbbC[x,y,t]/xy−t to a given formal deformation. However, I can't figure out how to make these maps surjective; ie, to keep the corresponding scheme maps from being multi-sheeted covering maps. In any event, I suspect this algebraic approach is wrong anyway, since it will, at best, only prove its a formal versal deformation.
I should also mention I am not sure if `faithfully flat' is the idea I want here. I am bad at knowing what modifiers to a flat family prevent pathological fibers, so if this is the wrong notion, please correct me.
No comments:
Post a Comment