Let me restate the theorem for variables.
Notation Read pbowtieq as "p is adjacent to q", and pnotbowtieq as "p is not adjacent to q".
Theorem Let G be a graph whose order is greater than 2. Let v1 and v2 be vertices such that v1neqv2landv1notbowtiev2 and degv1+degv2geninmathbbN. Then G is Hamiltonian iff G′=G+v1v2 is Hamiltonian.
Proof Assume G′ is Hamiltonian but not G. Therefore, by definition, there exists a cycle (p1,ldots,pn) in G connecting v1 (at p1) to v2 (at pn) visiting all of G's vertices. If pkbowtiep1 then pk−1notbowtiepn, since (p1,pk,pk+1,ldots,pn,pk−1,pk−2,ldots,p1) is a Hamiltonian cycle of G. As such, degpnlen−(1+degp1), a contradiction.
No comments:
Post a Comment