First, Let me talk about the "correct definition" of module over non-unital ring(not necessarily commutative) and how this definition coincide with usual definition of module over unital ring in particular case
First we study R−mod1={category of associative action of R on k-mod}= {(M,RbigotimeskMrightarrowM).
r1(r2z)=(r1r2)z}
Let R1=Rbigoplusk be an untial k-algebra with usual multiplication. And we have the categorical equivalence as: R−mod1approxR1−mod
Now,we define module over non-unital algebra R as R−mod=R1−mod/(TorsR1)−, where (TorsR1)− is Serre subcategory of R1−mod
R1−modoversetq∗RrightarrowR−mod is a localization functor having right adjoint functor.
Trivial Example:
if R has is an unital k-algebra. Then R1−mod is equivalent to R−mod
Less Trivial example in commutative case:
Consider affine line k[x]. Let R=xk[x](maximai ideal of k[x]). Then R−mod=Qcoh(mathbbA1−0). It is a cone.
Toy general case:
Let m is a two-sided proper ideal of associative commutative unital ring A. Then: we have
m−mod=A−mod/(MepsilonA−mod|mcdotM=0)−, whereT− is smallest Serre category containing T. It is clear that is equivalent to Qcoh(Complement of mathbbV(m)),where
mathbbV(m) is closed subvariety determined by m.
Now, I should stop here and write another(maybe)post on definition of sub-module. There are several reference:
Gabriel, Pierre Des catégories abéliennes. (French) Bull. Soc. Math. France 90 1962 323--448
Kontsevich-Rosenberg Noncommutative spaces and flat descent
Gabber-RameroAlmost Ring Theory
No comments:
Post a Comment