First, Let me talk about the "correct definition" of module over non-unital ring(not necessarily commutative) and how this definition coincide with usual definition of module over unital ring in particular case
First we study $R-mod_{1}$={category of associative action of $R$ on $k$-mod}= {($M$,$Rbigotimes _{k}Mrightarrow M$).
$r_{1}(r_{2}z)=(r_{1}r_{2})z$}
Let $R_{1}=Rbigoplus k$ be an untial $k$-algebra with usual multiplication. And we have the categorical equivalence as: $R-mod_{1}approx R_{1}-mod$
Now,we define module over non-unital algebra $R$ as $R-mod=R_{1}-mod/(Tors_{R_{1}})^{-}$, where $(Tors_{R_{1}})^{-}$ is Serre subcategory of $R_{1}-mod$
$R_{1}-modoverset{q_{R}^{*}}{rightarrow}R-mod$ is a localization functor having right adjoint functor.
Trivial Example:
if $R$ has is an unital $k$-algebra. Then $R_{1}-mod$ is equivalent to $R-mod$
Less Trivial example in commutative case:
Consider affine line $k[x]$. Let $R=xk[x]$(maximai ideal of $k[x]$). Then $R-mod$=$Qcoh(mathbb{A}^{1}-{0}$). It is a cone.
Toy general case:
Let $m$ is a two-sided proper ideal of associative commutative unital ring $A$. Then: we have
$m-mod$=$A-mod/({Mepsilon A-mod|mcdot M=0})^{-}$, where$T^{-}$ is smallest Serre category containing $T$. It is clear that is equivalent to Qcoh(Complement of $mathbb{V}(m)$),where
$mathbb{V}(m)$ is closed subvariety determined by $m$.
Now, I should stop here and write another(maybe)post on definition of sub-module. There are several reference:
Gabriel, Pierre Des catégories abéliennes. (French) Bull. Soc. Math. France 90 1962 323--448
Kontsevich-Rosenberg Noncommutative spaces and flat descent
Gabber-RameroAlmost Ring Theory
No comments:
Post a Comment