I would like to elaborate a little bit on my previous question which can be found
here.
Firstly, let me recall that a separable Banach space (X,|cdot|) is said to be
arbitrarily distortable if for every r>1 there exists an equivalent norm |cdot|
on X such that for every infinite-dimensional subspace Y of X we can find a pair of
vectors x,y in Y such that |x|=|y|=1 and |x|/|y|>r. If X has a Schauder
basis (en), then this definition is equivalent to the following:
For every r>1 there exists an equivalent norm |cdot| on X such that for every
normalized block sequence (vn) of (en) there exist a non-empty finite subset F
of mathbbN and a pair of vectors x,y in spanvn:ninF such that |x|=|y|=1
and |x|/|y|>r.
This equivalence gives us no hind of where the finite set F is located. In other words:
if a Banach space X with a Schauder basis is arbitrarily distortable, then where do
we have to search in order to find the vectors verifying that X is arbitrarily distortable?
Now, there are various ways of quantifying Banach space properties and my question
is towards understanding who the "difficulty" for finding these vectors can be quantified.
The main tool will be certain families of finite subsets of mathbbN. These families were discovered (independently) by two groups of researchers: Banach space theorists (Schreier families; see 1 below) and Ramsey theorists (uniform families; see 2 below). In particular, for the discussion below we need for every countable ordinal xigeq1 a family Fxi of finite subsets of mathbbN such that:
- Fxi is regular (i.e. compact, hereditary and spreading; I am sorry for not giving
the precise definition of these notions but this would make the post too long; but I
will be happy to answer to any comment). - The families are increasing (with respect to xi) both in size and complexity. That is, the "order" of Fxi is at least xi and if zeta<xi there there exists k such that all subsets of Fzeta whose minimum is greater than k belong to Fxi.
- For xi=1, let us take the Schreier family consisting of all finite subsets of
mathbbN whose size (or cardinality if you prefer) is less than or equal to their minimum.
There many examples of such families, all constructed using transfinite induction.
Some of them have extra important properties. For concreteness (and to simplify things)
let us work with the Schreier families.
Now we come to the following:
Definition: Let (X,|cdot|) be a Banach space with a Schauder basis (en) and xi be a countable ordinal with xigeq1. Let us say that X is xi-arbitrarily
distortable if for every r>1 there exists an equivalent norm |cdot| on X
such that for every normalized block sequence (vn) of (en) there exist a non-empty
set F belonging to the family Fxi and a pair of vectors x,y in spanvn:ninF such
that |x|=|y|=1 and |x|/|y|>r.
In other words, if X is xi-arbitrarily distortable, then we have narrow down the
search for the critical set F; it has to belong to an a priori given "nice" family
of finite subsets of mathbbN.
For every Banach space (X,|cdot|) with a Schauder basis (en) define
AD(X)=minxi:Xis$xi$−arbitrarilydistortable
if X is zeta-arbitrarily distortable for some 1leqzeta<omega1. Otherwise set AD(X)=omega1.
One can prove the following equivalence:
Let X be a separable Banach space with a Schauder basis.
Then X is arbitrarily distortable if and only if AD(X)<omega1.
This leaves open a number of interesting questions.
Question 1: Is it true that AD(ell2)>1? This is just a restatement of my
previous question.
Question 2: Can we compute AD(ellp) for every 1<p<+infty?
Question 3: Can we find for every countable ordinal xigeq1 an arbitrarily distortable
Banach space Xxi such that AD(Xxi)>xi. The answer is yes for xi=1; any arbitrarily
distortable asymptotic ell1 space X satisfies AD(X)>1.
Notice that an affirmative answer to Question 3 leaves no hope for a "uniform" approach
to distortion on general separable Banach spaces.
Some references:
D. Alspach and S. Argyros, Complexity of weakly null sequences, Dissertationes Math. 321 (1992), 1-44.
P. Pudlak and V. Rodl, Partition theorems for systems of finite subsets of integers,
Discrete Math. 39 (1982), 67-73.
No comments:
Post a Comment