Sunday, 18 March 2012

ac.commutative algebra - Primary decomposition for modules

I am quite curious about the definition and applications of the primary decomposition for modules.



  1. The definition of a primary submodule. (Let's assume we work over a commutative noetherian ring R and an R-module M) When I first worked on Atiyah-Macdonald I used this definition:


A submodule N of M is primary if any
zero divisor on M/N is nilpotent.




But recently I saw the definition in Matsumura's commutative algebra, which is slightly different:




A submodule N of M is primary if any
zero divisor on M/N is locally nilpotent, i.e. if a is a zero divisor, then for any xinM/N, there exists n possibliy depending on x such that anx=0.




Of course, these two definitions agree when M is a finite R-module. (which I guess is the most interesting case) But what should be the "right" definition in the general situation?



  1. The application of this. Is this generality of any use? If M is finite, then I know it admits a filtration with quotients being R/mathfrakpi where mathfrakpi are associated primes. This seems to be quite useful in some proofs. But what about the case where M is infinite?

3 Geometric meaning. Primary decomposition of an ideal I in R is related to the irreducible components of mathrmSpec(R/I). Is there something similar for the module case?



Thanks very much!



Edit: As there still does not seem to be a clear consensus of answers, it would be great if experts could weigh in.

No comments:

Post a Comment