There is no standard way to define this idea, and I doubt there is a useful one.
If I were trying to invent a definition, I'd say the following:
We should definitely have (ab)i=aibi and (ai)i=a−1. The first says that taking the i-th power is a homomorphism from the multiplicative group of the field to itself. Since the multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic, the only homomorphisms from it to itself are of the form amapstoak for some integer k.
Which integers k should we accept? The second property imposes ak2=a−1 modulo p. This implies that k2=−1mod(p−1).
For most primes p, there are no solutions to k2=−1mod(p−1). In the cases that there are, you could define raising to the i power to means raising to the k power for such a k. For example, when p=11, you could define ai to mean a3, and you would get the two properties above.
I wouldn't do this though. At least in the areas of math where I work, it is considered a bad idea to define an operation on Fp that doesn't extend nicely to the fields Fpj. And there will never be a good definition of raising to the i power in Fp2. In order to get one, you'd need a solution to k2=−1modp2−1. But, for any prime other than 3, p2−1 is divisible by 3, and k2+1 is never divisible by 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment