Thursday, 18 September 2008

ac.commutative algebra - What is the insight of Quillen's proof that all projective modules over a polynomial ring are free?

Here is a summary of what I learned from a nice expository account by Eisenbud (written in French), can be found as number 27 here.



First, one studies a more general problem: Let A be a Noetherian ring, M a finite presented projective A[T]-module. When is M extended from A, meaning there is A-module N such that M=A[T]otimesAN?



The proof can be broken down to 2 punches:



Theorem 1 (Horrocks) If A is local and there is a monic finA[T] such that Mf is free over Af, then M is A-free



(this statement is much more elementary than what was stated in Quillen's paper).



Theorem 2 (Quillen) If for each maximal ideal msubsetA, Mm is extended from Am[T], then M is extended from A



(on A, locally extended implies globally extended).



So the proof of Serre's conjecture goes as follows: Let A=k[x1,cdots,xn1], T=xn, M projective over A[T]. Induction (invert all monic polynomials in k[T] to reduce the dimension) + further localizing at maximal ideals of A + Theorem 1 show that M is locally extended. Theorem 2 shows that M is actually extended from A, so by induction must be free.



Eisenbud note also provides a very elementary proof of Horrocks's Theorem, basically using linear algebra, due to Swan and Lindel (Horrocks's original proof was quite a bit more geometric).



As Lieven wrote, the key contribution by Quillen was Theorem 2: patching. Actually the proof is fairly natural, there is only one candidate for N, namely N=M/TM, so let M=A[T]otimesAN and build an isomorphism MtoM from the known isomorphism locally.



It is hard to answer your question: what did Serre miss (-:? I don't know what he tried? Anyone knows?

No comments:

Post a Comment