Let K be a group (with discrete topology), G be a Lie group. Let $operatorname{Hom}(K,G)$ be the space of all group homomorphisms from K to G. This is a closed subvariety of the space of all the maps from the generators of K to G, and as such has a topology.
Andre Weil's paper "On Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups" proves that an important subset $U subset operatorname{Hom}(K,G)$ is open. U is defined as the set of all homomorphism $Kto G$ such that the homomorphism is injective, the image is discrete, and the quotient $G/image(K)$ is compact.
Questions:
What happens if you remove the condition that the quotient is compact?
How often/where is this taught? What kinds of books would it be in, what kind of courses would have it? This looks like a basic result that could be taught anywhere,
but it's completely new to me (not that I know much about representation theory).
while Weil's paper fortunately seems very readable, I couldn't easily find any other
source that would such questions.
Motivation:
In the case where $K=pi_1 (S)$ is the fundamental group of a surface and $G=PSL_2(mathbb R)$, the space $operatorname{Hom}(K,G)$ is very closely related to the Teichmuller space of S. Every Riemann surface is a quotient of $PSL_2(mathbb R)$ by a discrete subgroup. So, for an element of $operatorname{Hom}(K,G)$, the quotient $G/image(K)$ corresponds to a Riemann surface and the data of the actual map $Kto G$ gives a marking on it.
Not every homomorphism $Kto G$ corresponds to a point of Teichmuller space. For example, the map that sends all of K to the identity is clearly no good, as the quotient $K/G$ is not topologically the same as the surface S. However, if the map is injective and the image of K in G is discrete, all will be well. So, Weil's theorem basically says that the Teichmuller space of S is an open subset of $operatorname{Hom}(pi_1(S),PSL_2(mathbb R))$.
However, since Weil's theorem requires the quotient to be compact, this won't work if S is a non-compact Riemann surface. I wonder how much more difficult life becomes in this case.
Disclaimer/Another question:
The above has a small lie in it. To get the Teichmuller space, you actually need to look at the quotient $operatorname{Hom}(K,G)/G$ where G acts on $operatorname{Hom}(K,G)$ by conjugation of the target. In the case of compact surfaces, this is not supposed to mess up the fact that the subset is open; this seems to be a result of William Goldman but I don't have the exact reference. If you can say anything about this, I'd appreciate it too.
Thank you very much!
No comments:
Post a Comment