OK...I think I see how to do this now. In the end, I am seeing (p−1)2 distinct (phi,Gamma)-modules which matches well with the Galois side.
To do this, let D be any 1-dimensional etale (phi,Gamma)-module. Let e be a basis, and set phi(e)=h(T)e with h(T)inFp((T))times. Write h(T)=h0Taf(T) with h0inFtpimes and f(T)inFp[[T]] with f(0)=1.
Changing basis from e to u(T)e with u(T)inFp((T))times gives
phi(u(T)e)=u(Tp)h(T)e=fracu(Tp)u(T)h(T)(u(T)e).
I claim one can find u(T) such that u(T)/u(Tp) equals any element of 1+TFp[[T]]. Indeed, for such an element g(T), the infinite product prodij=1nftyphij(g(T)) (which hopefully converges since g(0)=1) works.
Thus, we can change basis so that phi has the form phi(e)=h0Tae -- i.e. we can kill off the f(T) term. Further, by making a change of basis of the form e goes to Tbe, we may assume that 0leqa<p−1.
Now, we use the fact that the phi and Gamma actions commute (which is a strong condition even in dimension 1). Namely, let gamma be a generator of Gamma, and set gammae=g(T)e. Then gammaphie=phigammae implies
((1+T)chi(gamma)−1)ag(T)=g(Tp)Ta.
Comparing leading coefficients, we see this is only possible if a=0 and g(T) is a constant.
Thus, D has a basis e so that phi(e)=h0e and gamma(e)=g0e with h0,g0inFtpimes as desired.
Does this look okay? Any takers for the 2-dimensional case?
No comments:
Post a Comment