Friday, 18 September 2009

ag.algebraic geometry - difference between equivalence relations on algebraic cycles

I will focus on complex projective varieties.



Codimension one



The situation in codimension one is considerably simpler than in higher codimensions.
Codimension one rational equivalence classes are parametrized by Pic(X)=H1(X,mathcalOastX) while algebraic equivalence classes are parametrized by the Neron-Severi group of X, which can be defined as the image of the Chern class map from Pic(X) to H2(X,mathbbZ). It follows that in codimension one



  • the group of rational equivalence classes is a countable union of abelian varieties;

  • the groups of algebraic equivalence classes and homological equivalence classes coincide, and are equal to NS(X) a subgroup of H2(X,mathbbZ);

  • the group of numerical equivalence classes is the quotient of NS(X) by its torsion subgroup.

Higher codimension



The higher codimension case, as pointed out by Tony Pantev, is considerably more complicate and algebraic and homological equivalence no longer coincide.



Concerning rational equivalence, Mumford proved that the Chow group of zero cycles of surfaces admitting non-zero holomorphic 2-forms are infinite dimensional, contradicting a conjecture by Severi. The paper is Mumford, D. Rational equivalence of 0-cycles on surfaces. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 9 1968.



Warning



The definitions of rational and algebraic equivalence at wikipedia are not correct.
I will commment below on the algebraic equivalence.



There one can find the following definition.




ZalgZ if there exists a curve C and a
cycle V on X×C flat over C, such
that Vcapleft(Xtimeslbracecrbraceright)=ZquadtextandquadVcapleft(Xtimeslbracecrbraceright)=Z


for two points c and d on the
curve.




This is not correct. The correct definition is




ZalgZ if there exists a curve C and a
cycle V on X×C flat over C, such
that Vcapleft(Xtimeslbracecrbraceright)Vcapleft(Xtimeslbracedrbraceright)=ZZ


for two points c and d on the
curve.




To construct an example of two algebraically equivalent divisors which do not satisfy the wikipedia definition let X be a projective variety with H1(X,mathcalOX)neq0 and
take a non-trivial line-bundle mathcalL over X with zero Chern class.
If Y=mathbbP(mathcalOXoplusmathcalL) then Y contains two copies X0 and Xinfty of X ( one for each factor of mathcalOXoplusmathcalL ) which are algebraically equivalent but can't be deformed because their normal bundles are mathcalL and mathcalLast. This does not contradict the second definition because for sufficiently ample divisors H it is clear X0+H can be deformed into Xinfty+H.

No comments:

Post a Comment