I find that the notion of fundamental vector field is well defined not only for G-principal bundle but even for any G-manifold, i.e. a manifold with an action by a Lie group G.
About your notional equation, I would say that the fundamental vector fields effectively arise from an action of frakg on M. However some clarifications are needed.
Let Psi:MtimesGtoM be a right action of a Lie group G on a manifold M.
Let frakg be the Lie algebra of G, viewed as formed by the left invariant vectorfields on G.
Then there exists a unique map zetaPsiequivzeta:XinfrakgmapstozetaXinmathfrakX(M) such that (Tpsi)circ(0M+X)=zetaXcircPsi, zetaX and 0M+X are Psi-related, for any Xinfrakg.(Above 0M denoted the zero vectorfield on M.)
For any Xinfrakg, the vector field zetaX on M is called the fundamental vectorfield corresponding to X w.r.t. the right action Psi.
The definition of zeta is well posed just because, for any Xinfrakg, the map TPsicirc(0M+X) is constant on the fibers of Psi; and this holds being Psi a right action and X a left invariant vectorfield.
Obviously the following properties are satisfied:
- zetaaX+bY=azetaX+bzetaY,zeta[X,Y]=[zetaX,zetaY], for any a,binmathbbR, and X,Yinfrakg, i.e. zeta:mathfrakgtomathfrakX(M) is a Lie algebra homomorphism;
- zetaX is complete and its t-time flow is PsiexptX, for any Xinfrakg and tinmathbbR.
For an abstract Lie algebra frakg, an action of frakg on a manifold M is defined to be a Lie algebra homomorphism from frakg to frakX(M).
In such a way for any right action Psi of a Lie group G on M, we have that zetaPsi is an action on M by the Lie algebra of G.
No comments:
Post a Comment