ag.algebraic geometry - Motivation for the étale topology over other possibilities

In the search for a Weil cohomology theory $H$ over a field $K$ (with $text{char}(K)=0$) for varieties in characteristic $p$, a classical argument by Serre shows that the coefficient field cannot be a subfield of $mathbb{R}$ or of $mathbb{Q}_p$; an obvious choice is to take $mathbb{Q}_ell$ for a prime $ell neq p$.

Now, we can try to make a Weil cohomology theory by taking the sheaf cohomology with constant sheaves with the Zariski topology, but this does not work as all cohomology vanishes.
Grothendieck's insight was that we can find a different topology, for example the étale topology. Then we can build a Weil cohomology theory with coefficients in $mathbb{Q}_ell$ by taking cohomology with coefficients in the constant sheaves $mathbb{Z}/ ell^nmathbb{Z}$ and then taking the inverse limit with respect to $n$ and tensor with $mathbb{Q}_ell$: this gives $ell$-adic cohomology.

But it is not so clear to me why the étale topology is best suited at this task. What happens if we repeat the above procedure on other sites? Does the cohomology theory we get fail to be a Weil cohomology theory?

P.S.: Information for fields other than $mathbb{Q}_ell$ would also be nice!

• Next ca.analysis and odes - variational formulation: boundedness of the bilinear form
• Previous ca.analysis and odes - On the extension of a limit