It looks false to me. Let V=mathbbQ2, and let V(mathbbR)=V0oplusV2 where V0 is the line defined by y=ex and V2
is the line defined by y=pix. Give V0 the unique Hodge structure of
type (0,0) and V2 the unique Hodge structure of type (1,1). To say
that w is defined over the subfield mathbbQmathrmal of
mathbbC means that the gradation V(mathbbR)=V0oplusV2
arises from a gradation of V(mathbbQmathrmal) by tensoring up,
but this isn't true. Perhaps the all the "resources" have additional
conditions, or perhaps they are all ...
Added: When you are defining a Shimura variety, the weight homomorphism w factors through a Q-subtorus of GL(V), and then it is true that w is defined over the algebraic closure of Q (because, for tori T,T', the group Hom(T,T') doesn't change when you pass from one algebraically closed field to a larger field).
No comments:
Post a Comment