The question I will ask makes sense in much more generality, but I will leave the translation to the experts, since I'm only looking for a special case (and it would not surprise me if the answer does not generalize). I will give some background, and then ask my question as a conjecture, set apart from the main text.
Let mathbbRn have its usual metric, and pick a differential one-form (= vector field) B (the "magnetic potential") and a differential zero-form (= function) C (the "electric potential"). Then consider the following second-order ODE for parameterized paths gamma:[0,T]tomathbbRn:
0=ddotgamma+dBcdotdotgamma+dCquadquadtext(EOM)
I'll let you pick the signs for how the two-form dB eats the vector dotgamma; just be consistent.
Then (EOM) is nondegenerate, and so a solution is determined by its initial conditions (dotgamma(0),gamma(0)). For each TinmathbbR, let phiT:mathbbR2ntomathbbRn be the "flow by time T" (actually, it is defined only on an open subset of mathbbR2n, given by phiT(v,q)=gamma(T) for the solution gamma to (EOM) with initial conditions (dotgamma(0),gamma(0))=(v,q). Then phiT is smooth; in fact, it is smooth in the T variable as well. This follows from some standard fundamental result in ODEs, for which I don't have a good reference.
A path gamma:[0,T]tomathbbRn is classical if it satisfies (EOM); its duration is the number T. We can also consider paths with negative duration by flowing backwards, although we will not need to do so.
Definition: A point (v,q)inmathbbR2n is focal for duration T iff (phiT(v,q) is defined and) det(partialphiT(v,q)/partialv)=0; i.e. fix the q, think of phiT(−,q) as a function of v only, and ask that its differential is degenerate. By identifying (v,q) with its classical path, we will talk about "focal (classical) paths" for given durations.
It is a standard results (see e.g. Milnor's Morse Theory) that for a given point (v,q)inmathbbR2n, the durations TinmathbbR for which it is focal are discretely separated. Note that every (v,q) is focal for duration T=0.
Proposition: Let gamma be a classical path of duration T. Then it is non-focal if and only if it extends to a family of classical paths smoothly parametrized by the boundary positions (gamma(0),gamma(T)).
Sketch of Proof: Being focal for duration T is a closed condition on mathbbR2n, so we can vary gamma(0)=q while remaining non-focal. But for non-focal paths we can vary gamma(T) via the inverse function theorem.
Anyway, pick qinmathbbRn, and v=B(q) (or −B(q) depending on your sign convention: for experts, I want the momentum to vanish). Then for some epsilon>0, for all Tin(0,epsilon), (v,q) is non-focal for duration T. Thus, for each Tin(0,epsilon), I can find an open neighborhood qinmathcalO0subseteqmathbbRn and another open neighborhood mathcalO1subseteqmathbbRn so that for (q0,q1)inmathcalO0timesmathcalO1, there is a non-focal classical path gamma of duration T with gamma(0)=q0, gamma(T)=q1, depending smoothly on the boundary conditions, and such that the classical path of duration T and initial conditions (dotgamma(0),gamma(0))=(v,q) is contained within this family.
Note that as Tto0, the classical path with initial conditions (dotgamma(0),gamma(0))=(v,q) ends at a point very close to q. I don't know if I can take mathcalO1 to actually contain q.
I would like to reverse the direction of choices: I'd like to pick mathcalO0,mathcalO1 first.
Question/Conjecture: Let qinmathbbRn. Then there exist open neighborhood mathcalO0,mathcalO1subseteqmathbbRn, with qinmathcalO0,mathcalO1, and epsilon>0 such that:
- There exists a family of classical paths gamma with boundary values varying in mathcalO0,mathcalO1 and with duration varying in (0,epsilon). I.e. let Delta=(T,t)inmathbbR2:Tin(0,epsilon),tin[0,T]; then there is a smooth function gamma:mathcalO0timesmathcalO1timesDeltatomathbbRn with: (a) gamma(q0,q1,T,−) is classical for each (q0,q1,T)inmathcalO0timesmathcalO1times(0,epsilon), and (b) gamma(q0,q1,T,0)=q0 and gamma(q0,q1,T,T)=q1.
- For each Tin(0,epsilon), the classical path of duration T with initial conditions (B(q),q) appears as some gamma(q,q1,T,−).
For comparison, the corresponding theorem about geodesics on a Riemannian manifold is standard: around any point you can find a small neighborhood such that any two points in the neighborhood can be connected by a unique geodesic that does not leave the neighborhood. In fact, it follows from the proposition and the observation that changing the duration of a geodesic for fixed boundary conditions amounts just to a linear reparameterization.
No comments:
Post a Comment