Saturday, 20 November 2010

measure theory - Is every smooth function Lebesgue-Lebesgue measurable?

This is motivated by pure curiosity (triggered by this question). A map f:mathbbRntomathbbRm is said to be Lebesgue-Lebesgue measurable if the pre-image of any Lebesgue-measurable subset of mathbbRm is Lebesgue-measurable in mathbbRn. This class of maps is terribly inconvenient to deal with but it might be useful sometimes. And maybe it is not that bad in the case m=1, especially if the answer to the following question is affirmative.



Question: Is every C1 function f:mathbbRntomathbbR Lebesgue-Lebesgue measurable? If not, what about Cinfty functions?



I could not figure out the answer even for n=1. However, there are some immediate observations (please correct me if I am wrong):



  • Since the map is already Borel measurable, the desired condition is equivalent to the following: if AsubsetmathbbR has zero measure, then f1(A) is measurable.

  • If dfne0 almost everywhere, then f is Lebesgue-Lebesgue measurable (because locally it is a coordinate projection, up to a C1 diffeomorphism). So the question is essentially about how weird f can be on the set where df=0.

  • If the answer is affirmative for C1, it is also affirmative for Lipschitz functions (by an approximation theorem).

  • The answer is negative for C0, already for n=1. An example is a continuous bijection mathbbRtomathbbR that sends a Cantor-like set K of positive measure to the standard (zero-measure) Cantor set. There is a non-measurable subset of K but its image is measurable since it is a subset of a zero-measure set.

No comments:

Post a Comment