Simon Thomas's approach answers Question 2 too. The answer is that for any nonzero real number x there exists such a subring (possibly without 1) not containing x.
Proof: Let K be the Puiseux series field overlinemathbfQ((tmathbfQ)), let A be its valuation ring, and let mathfrakm be its maximal ideal.
If xinmathbfR is not algebraic over mathbfQ, then choose an identification mathbfCsimeqK sending x to the transcendental element 1/t, and use the subring mathbfRcapA.
If xinmathbfRtimes is algebraic over mathbfQ, then choose an identification mathbfCsimeqK again, and use mathbfRcapmathfrakm (a subring of mathbfR without 1). square
Remark: If one insists on using subrings with 1, then the answer is that such a subring not containing x exists if and only if xnotinmathbfZ.
Proof: Repeat the argument above, but in the case where x is algebraic (and outside mathbfZ), use mathbfRcap(mathbfZ+mathfrakm).
No comments:
Post a Comment