Friday, 25 March 2011

ra.rings and algebras - Are there countable index subrings of the reals?

Simon Thomas's approach answers Question 2 too. The answer is that for any nonzero real number x there exists such a subring (possibly without 1) not containing x.



Proof: Let K be the Puiseux series field overlinemathbfQ((tmathbfQ)), let A be its valuation ring, and let mathfrakm be its maximal ideal.



If xinmathbfR is not algebraic over mathbfQ, then choose an identification mathbfCsimeqK sending x to the transcendental element 1/t, and use the subring mathbfRcapA.



If xinmathbfRtimes is algebraic over mathbfQ, then choose an identification mathbfCsimeqK again, and use mathbfRcapmathfrakm (a subring of mathbfR without 1). square



Remark: If one insists on using subrings with 1, then the answer is that such a subring not containing x exists if and only if xnotinmathbfZ.



Proof: Repeat the argument above, but in the case where x is algebraic (and outside mathbfZ), use mathbfRcap(mathbfZ+mathfrakm).

No comments:

Post a Comment