As said, the sought after concept is also known as Weil restriction. In a word, it is the algebraic analogue of the process of viewing an n-dimensional complex variety as a (2n)-dimensional real variety.
The setup is as follows: let L/K be a finite degree field extension and let X be a scheme over L. Then the Weil restriction WL/KX is the K-scheme representing the following functor on the category of K-algebras:
AmapstoX(AotimesKL).
In particular, one has WL/KX(K)=X(L).
By abstract nonsense (Yoneda...), if such a scheme exists it is uniquely determined by the above functor. For existence, some hypotheses are necessary, but I believe that it exists whenever X is reduced of finite type.
Now for a more concrete description. Suppose X=mathrmSpecL[y1,...,yn]/J is an affine scheme. Let d=[L:K] and a1,...,ad be a K-basis of L. Then we make the following "substitution":
yi=a1xi1+...+adxid,
thus replacing each yi by a linear expression in d new variables xij. Moreover,
suppose J=langleg1,...,gmrangle; then we substitute each of the above equations into gk(y1,...,yn) getting a polynomial in the x-variables, however still with L-coefficients. But now using our fixed basis of L/K, we can regard a single polynomial with L-coefficients as a vector of d polynomials with K coefficients. Thus we end up with md generating polynomials in the x-variables, say generating an ideal I in K[xij], and we put mathrmResL/KX=mathrmSpecK[xij]/I.
A great example to look at is the case X=Gm (multiplicative group) over L=mathbbC (complex numbers) and K=mathbbR. Then X is the spectrum of
mathbbC[y1,y2]/(y1y2−1);
put yi=xi1+sqrt−1xi2 and do the algebra. You can really see that the
corresponding real affine variety is mathbbRleft[x,yright]left[(x2+y2)−1right], as it should be: see e.g.
p. 2 of
http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete/SC5-AlgebraicGroups.pdf
for the calculations.
Note the important general property that for a variety X/L, the dimension of the Weil restriction from L down to K is [L:K] times the dimension of X/L. This is good to keep in mind so as not to confuse it with another possible interpretation of "restriction of scalars", namely composition of the map XtomathrmSpecL with the map mathrmSpecLtoSpecK to
give a map XtomathrmSpecK. This is a much weirder functor, which preserves the dimension but screws up things like geometric integrality. (When I first heard about "restriction of
scalars", I guessed it was this latter thing and got very confused.)
No comments:
Post a Comment