I proved over here that statement ii) holds when we make the stronger assumption that |N(u)capN(v)| is exactly 1 for every u,v.
Most of the argument probably does not generalize, but at least one piece of it does. That part is that if G is a minimal counterexample, then the complement graph is connected. I'll prove this by contradiction:
Let X and Y be a partition of the vertices into two nonempty parts such that every vertex in X is connected to every vertex in Y. If X has even size, then we see that Y has the same property G has and is smaller than G, so Y has odd size and G has an odd number of vertices. If X has odd size, then if we collapse X to a point x we still have the property that |N(u)capN(v)| is odd for u,v in Y, and also for any u in Y, |N(x)capN(u)| is odd by your step i), so Ycupx satisfies the same properties G does and contains a vertex that is connected to everything, so Ycupx has odd size, so G has odd size.
Unfortunately, I can't see any obvious nice relationship that must be satisfied by two nonadjacent vertices in our graph G...
No comments:
Post a Comment