As far as I understand, this is false. Here is an example (familiar to D-module people):
A=k[x,y]; M=k[a,b] on which x (resp. y) acts as fracdda (resp. fracddb).
Since the action of both x and y is locally nilpotent, M is supported at the origin of
Spec(A). Therefore, the only non-zero Tor's of the kind you consider are Tori(M,k), where both x and y act on k by zero. These Tor's are easy to compute (they amount to computing de Rham cohomology of affine plane with coordinates a and b), and they are non-zero precisely when i=2. (Essentially, the calculation repeats the proof of Kashiwara's Lemma.)
Monday, 30 July 2012
ag.algebraic geometry - Flatness of modules via Tor
at
08:48
Labels:
Mathematics

Related Posts:
- ho.history overview - Did Gelfand's theory of commutative Banach algebras influence algebraic geometers?
- Reference for Unitary Group attached to $E/k$
- Making sense of the Fourier transform of the product of two functions
- soft question - Most striking applications of category theory?
- ag.algebraic geometry - A versal deformation of a simple node
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment