I'm not sure I should bother answering this question, because it seems like the original poster may not have asked the right question. However, it is a nice exercise in basic asymptotics.
For x sufficiently large, the sum in question is decreasing.
First, note that this sum is equal to
sumkgeq1frac(logx)k−1xk!zeta(k+1).
(See here for a very similar series; we are using the highly nontrivial identity summu(i)/i=0 to get rid of the "k=0" term.)
Substituting x=eu, we want to know whether or not
e−usumkgeq1fracuk−1k!zeta(k+1)
is increasing or decreasing in u. One can justify taking term by term derivatives, so we want to know whether
e−uleft(sumkgeq2frac(k−1)uk−2k!zeta(k+1)−sumkgeq1fracuk−1k!zeta(k+1)right)
is positive or negative.
Rearranging terms, we are interested in the sign of
e−usumellgeq0fracuellell!left(frac1(ell+2)zeta(ell+3)−frac1(ell+1)zeta(ell+2)right).
The quantity in parenthesis is −1/(ell+1)(ell+2)+O(2−ell). So we are interested in the sign of
e−uleft(−sumellgeq0fracuell(ell+2)!+sumO(fracuell2−ellell!)right)=
e−uleft(−fraceu−1−uu2+O(eu/2)right)=
−1/u2+O(e−u/2).
This is negative for u sufficiently large.
No comments:
Post a Comment