Since mathbbR and any 3-manifold N must be non-exotic, their product mathbbRtimesN cannot possibly be diffeomorphic to exotic mathbbR4, correct?
Update: Andy Putman already answered this question in a different thread, as pointed out by Steven Sivek below. The answer is yes, but not for the reasoning I implied above, because, I gather, the product could in principle be taken in a nontrivial way that alters the differentiable structure.
The proof outlined by Andy relies on mathbbRtimesN being piecewise linearly isomorphic to mathbbR4, which is said to be proved in "Cartesian products of contractible open manifolds" by McMillan, which happens to be freely available here:
http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1961-67-05/S0002-9904-1961-10662-9/S0002-9904-1961-10662-9.pdf .
The relevant part of that paper is as follows:
"A recent result of M. Brown asserts that a space is topologically En if it is the sum of an ascending sequence of open subsets each homeomorphic to En.
THEOREM 2. Let U be a W-space. Then UtimesE1 is topologically E4
Proof. Let U=suminftyi=1Hi where Hi is a cube with handles and HisubseteqtextIntHi+1. By the above result of Brown, it suffices to show that if i is a positive integer and [a,b] an interval of real numbers (altb), then there is a 4-cell C such that
Hitimes[a,b]subseteqtextIntCsubseteqCsubseteqUtimesE1.
There is a finite graph G in (textIntHi)times(a+b)/2 such that if V is an open set in UtimesE1 containing G then there is a homeomorphism h of UtimesE1 onto itself such that h(Hitimes[a,b])subseteqV. But G is contractible to a point in UtimesE1. Hence, by Lemma 8 of [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 66, 485 (1960)], a 4-cell in UtimesE1 contains G, and the result follows."
A W-space was earlier defined as a contractible open 3-manifold, each compact subset of which is embeddable in a 3-sphere.
I'm not sure what it means for a simply connected manifold such as mathbbR3 to be equal to an infinite sum of cubes with handles, but given that, can we say that the above machination qualifies as a piecewise linear isomorphism because each Hitimes[a,b] can be covered with a chart, and each C can be covered with a chart, such that there is a linear mapping between the two?
No comments:
Post a Comment