Dear all,
The following is a theorem known to many, and is essential in elementary differential geometry. However, I have never seen its proof in Spivak or various other differential geometry books.
Let t0 be real, and x0inmathbbRn and a,b>0. Let f:[t0−a,t0+a]timesoverlineB(x0,b)rightarrowmathbbRn be Ck for kge1.
Then f is Lipschitz continuous, with which it is easy, using the contraction mapping theorem of complete metric spaces, to prove that the ODE:
dfracddtalpha(t,x)=f(t,alpha(t,x)),quadalpha(t0,x)=x
has a continuous solution in an open neighbourhood of (t0,x0). In other words, the ODE
x′(t)=f(t,x(t));x(t0)=x0 has a family of solutions which depends continuously on the initial condition x0.
The theorem that I'd like to prove is that, in fact, if f is Ck, then alpha is Ck, for any kge1.
I'd like an "elementary" proof that needs no calculus on Banach spaces or any terribly hard theory such as that, but hopefully something elementary, such as the contraction mapping theorem. I currently have an attempt of a proof that looks at perturbations of linear ODEs, but it is incorrect (I think). The proof can be found on page 6 of http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/hitchin/hitchinnotes/Differentiable_manifolds/Appendix.pdf. I believe that there is a typo in the claim:
"Apply the previous lemma and we get
mathrmsupleft|tright|leqepsilonleft|lambda(t,x)y−alpha(t,x+y)+alpha(x)right|=o(left|yright|)."
but more importantly, what it should be replaced by is incorrect. What is needed is that ||A−By||=o(||y||) but I do not see why this is.
Thank you for your time and effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment