I've been dealing with the following situation:
Let RsubseteqS be an extension of Dedekind rings, where Quot(R)=:LsubseteqE:=Quot(S) is a G-Galois extension. Let mathfrakp be a prime of R, and mathfrakq a primes of S above mathfrakp. Let Dmathfrakq denote the decomposition group, and Imathfrakq the inertia group, of mathfrakq over mathfrakp.
However, unlike in the classic case, I allow the residue fields of mathfrakp to be infinite, with positive characteristic. So the extension of residue fields may be inseparable.
It seems that the paper I'm reading implicitly assumes:
|Imathfrakq|=e[kappa(mathfrakq):kappa(mathfrakp)]i (the ramification index times the inseparability degree of the residue extension)
|Dmathfrakq|=e[kappa(mathfrakq):kappa(mathfrakp)]
|G|=re[kappa(mathfrakq):kappa(mathfrakp)] (where r is the number of primes above mathfrakp)
Is that right? I keep hitting walls when I try to prove it.
No comments:
Post a Comment