Well, not always, e.g. take X=mathbbP2 with homogeneous co-ordinates x,y,z, U the locus defined by xyzne0 and sigma the involution of U defined by (x,y,z)mapsto(yz,xz,xy) (the standard quadratic Cremona transformation of X). Then sigma is of order 2 and does not extend to X. On the other hand some sufficient conditions, in characteristic zero, are: there are no rational curves in XsetminusU; X has ample canonical class and is smooth (this can be weakened to having canonical singularities).
[Update: Charles Siegel asked for references, and I have none to hand, although this is all well known.]
For the Cremona example, recall that every automorphism of mathbbP2 is linear, and sigma clearly isn't. More geometrically, sigma blows up the vertices of the triangle xyz=0 and collapses its sides.
No rational curves in XsetminusU: fix ginG and think of it as a rational map g:XtoX. By Hironaka, there is a minimal composite p:ZtoX of blow-ups such that gcircp is regular. If XsetminusU has no rational curves, then the rational curves in the exceptional divisor of the last blow-up are contracted, so the last blow-up was redundant, contradicting minimality.
Ample canonical class omegaX: then X=Proj(R(X,omegaX)), with R(X)=oplusnge0H0(X,omegaotimesnX), the canonical ring. This is a birational invariant of X, so G acting on U acts on R(X), so on X.
No comments:
Post a Comment