Dirichlet's remark from the first paper is extracted and translated on page 98 of The Development of Prime Number Theory by Narkiewicz. So this has not passed completely unnoticed. Narkiewicz remarks that Dirichlet believed that his analytic methods would enable him to prove Legendre's conjecture, and that Dirichlet never returned to the problem.
Dirichlet remained interested in the asymptotic growth laws ("Asymptotische Gesetze") of arithmetic functions for the rest of his life, as seen from his 1849 paper with the estimate
$$
sum_{n leq x}d(n) = xlog(x) + (2gamma - 1)x + O(x^{1/2}),
$$
and a couple of other estimates, and a letter of 1858 to Kronecker reprinted in Dirichlet's Werke, where he mentions having obtained a substantial improvement of the error term $O(x^{1/2})$ by a new method.
Since Dirichlet demonstrably did not lose interest in such questions, and never returned to the PNT in print, it seems reasonable to believe that he discovered that his real-variable method would not yield the PNT.
No comments:
Post a Comment