I think Ady's question has a negative answer.
Recall that the Mazur map, $T$, from the unit ball of $ell_2$ onto the unit ball of $ell_1$, is defined by
$T(sum a_i e_i)= sum a_i^2 b_i e_i$, where $b_i$ is the sign of $a_i$. It is a uniform homeomorphism in the norm topologies and obviously is coordinatewise continuous, which means that it is weak ($=$ weak$*$ in $ell_2$) to weak$^*$ continuous (since on the unit ball of $ell_p$ with $p$ finite the
weak* topology is the topology of coordinatewise convergence).
$T$ is not weak to weak continuous since the unit vector basis converges weakly to zero in $ell_2$ but not in $ell_1$.
The problem is to extend $T$ to all of $ell_2$. I think that the easiest way to do this is to show that there is a retraction $R$ from $ell_2$ onto its unit ball which is both norm to norm continuous and weak to weak continuous. Define $R$ on the complement of the unit ball by
$$
R(sum a_i e_i) = sum_{i=1}^n a_i e_i + t e_{n+1},
$$
where $sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 le 1 < sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a_i^2$ and $t$ is chosen to have the same sign as $a_{n+1}$ and to make the image vector have norm one. $R$ is obviously continuous (even Lipschitz) in the norm topology and is continuous in the topology of coordinatewise convergence, hence is weak to weak continuous (since in all of $ell_2$, the weak topology is stronger than the topology of coordinatewise convergence).
To get a counterexample that maps one dual space to itself, work with the space $ell_2 oplus ell_1$.
No comments:
Post a Comment